Herbal infusions for medicinal purposes: comparative study of the nutritional and energetic contribution of twenty-seven aromatic plants
Conference Paper
Overview
Overview
abstract
Aromatic plants have been used worldwide for centuhes for nutritional and medicinal purposes.
They are traditionally used as herbal infusions for their attractive aroma and specific taste but
also in folk medicine as carminative agents against bronchitis and ulcers, as diuretics,
depuratives and vermifuges, as also for their antiscorbutic, antispasmodic, tonic, antimicrobial,
anti-inflammatory, antimutagenic and anti-carcinogenic properties [1, 2]. Nevertheless, despite
the increasing recognition of their beneficial effects, there is a growing loss of diversity of these
herbs [3]. Furthermore, the majority of the studies with plants consumed as infusions that are
available in literature do not include analyses in the infusion (which is the real consumed form),
but in dry material. Thus, in the present work, we aimed to provide scientific information
concerning the nutritional value and energetic contribution of infusions prepared from twenty-seven
widely used plant species in order to systematize the results obtained for an easier
comparison.
Most of the herbal infusions analysed presented fructose, glucose and sucrose in very low
amounts, with concentrations ranging from 6. 15 to 26. 80 mg/100 mL, and eight of these
infusions did not reveal the presence of any carbohydrate. Chamaespartium tridentatum (L.)
P. E. Gibbs. subsp. cantabrícum (Spach) and Equisetum giganteum L. revealed the highest
content of fructose (13.60 mg/100 mL) and glucose (12. 65 mg/100 mL), respectively. Regarding
to sucrose, the highest concentration was found in Cymbopogon citratus (DC. ) Stapf. (11. 50
mg/100 mL). Among all the infusions, Lavandula angustifolia Miller gave the highest energetic
contribution (107. 20 cal/100 mL), whereas Mentha x piperita L. (25. 20 cal/100 mL), Thymus x
citriodorus (Pers. ) Schreb. (24. 60 cal/100 mL) and Thymus mastichina L. (33. 60 cal/100 mL)
presented the lowest energy, without significant statistical differences.
The results obtained in the present systematization study will allow the readers to perform easy
and quick comparisons among these different aromatic plant infusions regarding nutritional
purposes.
