A path-flow analysis model for active drag force determinant variables in age-group swimmers
Conference Paper
Overview
Research
Identity
Additional Document Info
View All
Overview
abstract
The goal of competitive swimming is to
travel the event distance as fast as possible.
The identification of the parameters that
predict swimming performances is one of
the main aims of the swimming “science”
community. Indeed, it is consensual that
biomechanical and energetic variables are
determinant for enhance performance
(Barbosa et al, 2010).
The role of drag force in competitive swimming is one of the
main topics for researchers and field practitioners as it allows
enhancing performance. The development of “flow chart” models
confirming the relationships between drag force and other
determinant variables was never attempted in competitive
swimming. Moreover, main research groups dedicate little
attention to age-group swimming. PURPOSE: The aim was to
develop a structural equation modeling (i.e., path-flow analysis
model) for active drag force (Da) based on anthropometric,
hydrodynamic and biomechanical determinants in young
swimmers. The theoretical model was developed according to
main review papers about these determinants. METHODS:
Sixteen male swimmers (12.50±0.51 years-old; Tanner stages’ 1
-2) were evaluated. It was assessed: (i) anthropometrical
variables such as body mass, height, frontal surface area (FSA);
(ii) hydrodynamic variables including drag coefficient and Da
with the velocity perturbation method; (iii) the biomechanical
variables stroke length (SL), stroke frequency (SF) and
swimming velocity after a maximal 25-m bout. It was computed
the Spearmen´s Rank Correlation Coefficient between
exogenous and endogenous variables. Path-flow analysis was
performed with the estimation of linear regression standardized
coefficients between exogenous and endogenous variables.
When appropriate, according to the theoretical model, simple or
multiple linear regression models were computed. The
standardized regression coefficients (β) were considered and the
significance of each β was assessed with the student’s t-test
(p<0.05). The effect size of the disturbance term for a given
endogenous variable, which reflects unmeasured variables was 1
-R2. To verify the model fit, root mean square residual was
computed (RMSR < 0.1). RESULTS: The Da presented significant
association with all exogenous variables, except for SL and SF.
Confirmatory model excluded the FSA (RMSR > 0.1). Even so,
95% of Da was explained by remaining variables in the model.
CONCLUSION: Confirmatory path-flow model can be considered
as not suitable of the theory. For a near future it is advice to
develop new FSA estimation equations specific for young
swimmers rather than using models developed with adult/elite
swimmers.