A smart controlled-release fertilizer improved soil fertility but not olive tree physiology and yield
Conference Paper
Overview
Research
Additional Document Info
View All
Overview
abstract
Ermelinda Silva acknowledge the financiai support provided by national funds through FCT
(PD/BD/128274/2017), under PhD AgriChains (PD/00122/2012) and from the European Social Funds and the Regional
Operational Programme Norte 2020. This study was also supported by CITAB research unit (UIDB/04033/2020). The
research was integrated in the activities of the Operational Group "Novas práticas em olivais de sequeiro: estratégias
de mitigação e adaptação às alterações climáticas", funded by PT2020 and EAFRD (European Agricultural Fund for
Rural Development). Ermelinda Silva also acknowledges the financiai support from NORTE 2020 throughout the ,CERES
project (NORTE-OI-0145-FEDER-000082), funded by the Fundo Europeu de Desenvolvimento Regional (FEDER)
and project NORTE-06-3559-FSE-000I03 funded by the Fundo Social Europeu (FSE),
Livro
The use of a controlled-release fertilizer (CRF) was studied in a traditional rainfed olive
grove in the northeast of Portugal where precipitation is very irregular, particularly in the spring.
The objective of the study was to assess whether a CRF can improve the olive tree' s performance
compared to a conventional nitrogen (N) fertilizer (CF), by supplying N gradually and reducing
the risk of potential N loss from leaching. The fertilized treatments showed better plant N
nutritional status, which resulted in enhanced net photosynthesis and higher leaf concentrations
of total soluble sugars, chlorophylls and soluble proteins which, in turn, increased olive yield by
43% in comparison to the unfertilized control. Meanwhile, CRF show some advantages over the
CF, although by an unexpected effect. Not in a direct way, by improving trees performance, but
by enhancing soil fertility. The CRF treatments showed higher leveis of inorganic N in the soil by
autumn, an aspect that at the outset could be interpreted as nega tive, since it could lead to N
loss by leaching, but that proved to be a factor that may be behind the increase in the ol'ganic
carbon, kjeldahl nitrogen and glomalin-related soil proteins. Thus, the availability of soil
inürganlc-N in the autumn, in a climate in which excess precipitation and the risk of ieaching
usually only occur in winter, led to weeds growth that seem to act as a catch crop, capturing
residual inorganic N. Additionally, they contribute to protect the soil from erosion and to
increase soi! organic matter, aspects that can benefit the agrosystem in the long-term.